By Gregory L. Ward, Betty J. Birner
Some of the most vigorous and contentious concerns in modern linguistic conception matters the elusive boundary among semantics and pragmatics, and Professor Laurence R. Horn of Yale collage has been on the middle of that discuss ever for the reason that his groundbreaking 1972 UCLA dissertation. This quantity in honor of Horn brings jointly the easiest of present paintings on the semantics/pragmatics boundary from a neo-Gricean point of view. that includes the contributions of twenty-two prime researchers, it contains papers on implicature (Kent Bach), inference (Betty Birner), presupposition (Barbara Abbott), lexical semantics (Georgia eco-friendly, Sally McConnell-Ginet, Steve Kleinedler & Randall Eggert), negation (Pauline Jacobson, Frederick Newmeyer, Scott Schwenter), polarity (Donka Farkas, Anastasia Giannakidou, Michael Israel), implicit variables (Greg Carlson & Gianluca Storto), definiteness (Barbara Partee), reference (Ellen Prince, Andrew Kehler & Gregory Ward), and good judgment (Jerrold Sadock, Francis Jeffry Pelletier & Andrew Hartline). those unique papers signify not just a becoming homage to Larry Horn, but in addition a major contribution to semantic and pragmatic concept.
Read Online or Download Drawing the Boundaries of Meaning: Neo-Gricean studies in pragmatics and semantics in honor of Laurence R. Horn (Studies in Language Companion Series) PDF
Best language & grammar books
The outline for this publication, historical past of Rhetoric, quantity I: The artwork of Persuasion in Greece, might be coming near near.
Linguistic edition in study Articles investigates the linguistic features of educational study articles, going past a conventional research of the generically-defined learn article take into consideration diverse realizations of study articles inside and throughout disciplines. It combines corpus-based analyses of 70+ linguistic gains with analyses of the situational, or non-linguistic, features of the educational magazine Registers Corpus: 270 learn articles from 6 diversified disciplines (philosophy, heritage, political technology, utilized linguistics, biology, physics) and representing 3 sub-registers (theoretical, quantitative, and qualitative research).
This learn is anxious with the purchase of intonation through German/English bilingual kids. Nucleus placement, pitch move and intonational phraseology have been analysed on either the phonetic and the phonological point. The research was once conducted utilizing either the tonetic (British) and the ToBI transcription platforms.
The papers care for quite a number questions raised for linguistic concept and outline by means of polysynthetic languages. Prototypical polysynthetic lamguages, stumbled on between unrelated language households in such diversified components of the area as North the USA, Meso-America, Siberia, northern Australia, and Papua New Guinea, reveal remarkably comparable suites of grammatical features.
- Language and Translation in Postcolonial Literatures
- Semantic structure in english
- Beyond Narrative Coherence (Studies in Narrative)
- Research on Dictionary Use in the Context of Foreign Language Learning: Focus on Reading Comprehension
- English File Upper-Intermediate Teachers Book
Extra resources for Drawing the Boundaries of Meaning: Neo-Gricean studies in pragmatics and semantics in honor of Laurence R. Horn (Studies in Language Companion Series)
And W. Lycan. 1976. The Myth of Semantic Presupposition. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club. Burton-Roberts, N. 1989. The Limits to Debate: A Revised Theory of Semantic Presupposition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Chierchia, G. and S. McConnell-Ginet. 1990. Meaning and Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Donnellan, K. 1966. Reference and definite descriptions. Philosophical Review 77:281–304. Where have some of the presuppositions gone? Frege, G. 1892. Über Sinn und Bedeutung.
For example, in uttering “Bill is meeting a woman this evening” you would normally (in the absence of special circumstances) be implicating that the woman in question is not Bill’s wife. So it makes sense, without considering actual speakers’ intentions, to talk about what is likely to be implicated when a certain sentence is uttered. This might suggest that the GCI is a property of the sentence itself, even though GCIs are not semantic in character but are pragmatic regularities. Even so, it is the speaker, not the sentence, that does the implicating.
Karttunen, L. 1970. On the semantics of complement sentences. CLS 6. 328–339. Karttunen, L. 1973a. Presuppositions of compound sentences. Linguistic Inquiry 4:169–193. Karttunen, L. 1973b. STOP – is there a presupposition, or isn’t there? Ms. Karttunen, L. 1974. Presupposition and linguistic context. Theoretical Linguistics 1:181–193. Karttunen, L. and S. Peters. 1979. Conventional implicature. -K. Oh and D. , Syntax and Semantics, Volume 11: Presupposition. New York: Academic Press. 1–56. Kiparsky, P.