# C-star-algebras by Jacques Dixmier By Jacques Dixmier

Similar linear books

Constrained Optimal Control of Linear and Hybrid Systems

Many useful regulate difficulties are ruled through features akin to nation, enter and operational constraints, alternations among assorted working regimes, and the interplay of continuous-time and discrete occasion structures. at this time no technique is on the market to layout controllers in a scientific demeanour for such platforms.

The semicircle law, free random variables and entropy

The booklet treats unfastened chance concept, which has been greatly built because the early Eighties. The emphasis is wear entropy and the random matrix version strategy. the amount is a distinct presentation demonstrating the huge interrelation among the themes. Wigner's theorem and its extensive generalizations, reminiscent of asymptotic freeness of autonomous matrices, are defined intimately.

Limit Algebras: An Introduction to Subalgebras(Pitman Research Notes in Mathematics Series, 278)

Written through one of many key researchers during this box, this quantity develops the speculation of non-self adjoint restrict algebras from scratch.

Extra info for C-star-algebras

Sample text

2 Entropy of Dynamical Systems 53 It remains to prove the claims. If y ∈ ∪k B[−k,k] , then ϕ(αn (xx∗ )y) = ϕ(xx∗ )ϕ(y) if n is suﬃciently large. Thus any weak operator limit point a of the sequence {αn (xx∗ )}n has the property ϕ(ay) = ϕ(xx∗ )ϕ(y). Hence a = ϕ(xx∗ )1, and the ﬁrst claim is proved. To prove the second claim, note 1/2 that αn (x)ξϕ = Jϕ ∆ϕ αn (x∗ )ξϕ = λ−1/2 Jϕ αn (x∗ )ξϕ , where we use the same notation as on page 35.

A related but easier result is the following. 6. If {Ai }i is an increasing net of unital C∗ -subalgebras of a C∗ -algebra A such that ∪i Ai is norm-dense, then S(ϕ|Ai , ψ|Ai ) S(ϕ, ψ) for any ϕ and ψ. 28 2 Relative Entropy Proof. 10), since it suﬃces to consider step functions with values in ∪i Ai . Recall that a unital C∗ -algebra is called nuclear if there exist two nets {γi : Ai → A}i and {θi : A → Ai }i of unital completely positive maps with ﬁnite dimensional C∗ -algebras Ai such that (γi ◦ θi )(a) − a → 0 for every a ∈ A.

7) follows from (v) applied to the state ϕ. ˜ To prove (vii) note that as B is maximal abelian in A, we have TrA |B = TrB . In particular, if EB : A → B is the trace preserving conditional expectation, then Qϕ◦EB = Qϕ|B . Hence S(ϕ|B ) − S(ϕ) = ϕ(log Qϕ − log Qϕ|B ) = S(ϕ, ϕ ◦ EB ). 2(vi). Hence S(ϕ|B ) ≥ S(ϕ). If Qϕ ∈ B, then Qϕ|B = Qϕ as TrA |B = TrB , so S(ϕ|B ) = S(ϕ). Conversely, if S(ϕ|B ) = S(ϕ), then S(ϕ, ϕ◦EB ) = 0. 2(i) we get ϕ = ϕ◦EB , so Qϕ = Qϕ◦EB = Qϕ|B ∈ B, that is, B is in the centralizer of ϕ.