Automorphic Forms and Geometry of Arithmetic Varieties by K. Hashimoto, Y. Namikawa

By K. Hashimoto, Y. Namikawa

Automorphic varieties and Geometry of mathematics forms offers with the measurement formulation of varied automorphic kinds and the geometry of mathematics types. The relation among basic equipment of acquiring size formulation (for cusp forms), the Selberg hint formulation and the index theorem (Riemann-Rochs theorem and the Lefschetz fastened element formula), is examined.
Comprised of 18 sections, this quantity starts off via discussing zeta services linked to cones and their particular values, by means of an research of cusps on Hilbert modular forms and values of L-functions. The reader is then brought to the size formulation of Siegel modular kinds; the graded earrings of modular types in different variables; and Selberg-Iharas zeta functionality for p-adic discrete teams. next chapters concentrate on zeta services of finite graphs and representations of p-adic teams; invariants and Hodge cycles; T-complexes and Ogatas zeta 0 values; and the constitution of the icosahedral modular workforce.
This publication can be an invaluable source for mathematicians and scholars of arithmetic.

Show description

Read Online or Download Automorphic Forms and Geometry of Arithmetic Varieties PDF

Similar mathematics books

Surveys in Combinatorics

Combinatorics is an energetic box of mathematical examine and the British Combinatorial convention, held biennially, goals to survey crucial advancements via inviting extraordinary mathematicians to lecture on the assembly. The contributions of the central academics on the 7th convention, held in Cambridge, are released right here and the themes replicate the breadth of the topic.

Hamiltonian Methods in the Theory of Solitons

The most attribute of this now vintage exposition of the inverse scattering technique and its functions to soliton concept is its constant Hamiltonian method of the speculation. The nonlinear Schrödinger equation, instead of the (more traditional) KdV equation, is taken into account as a major instance. The research of this equation types the 1st a part of the publication.

The Mountain Pass Theorem: Variants, Generalizations and Some Applications (Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications)

Joussef Jabri offers min-max equipment via a accomplished learn of the several faces of the prestigious Mountain go Theorem (MPT) of Ambrosetti and Rabinowitz. Jabri clarifies the extensions and versions of the MPT in an entire and unified approach and covers normal issues: the classical and twin MPT; second-order info from playstation sequences; symmetry and topological index concept; perturbations from symmetry; convexity and extra.

Extra resources for Automorphic Forms and Geometry of Arithmetic Varieties

Sample text

Ramanujan Birth Centenary Int. , TIFR, Bombay, 1988. H. Shimizu, On discontinuous groups operating on the product of upper half planes, Ann. , 77 (1963), 33-71. T. Shintani, On zeta-functions associated with the vector space of quadratic forms, J. Fac. , Univ. Tokyo, 22 (1975), 25-65. , On evaluation of zeta functions of totally real algebraic number fields at non-positive integers, J. Fac. , Univ. Tokyo, 23 (1976), 393-417. C. L. Siegel, Über die Zetafunktionen indefiniter quadratischer Formen, Math.

52 R. Tsushima /j is an intersection of Ex and another irreducible component in E which we denote by E2. So we have Since X2(N) has (1/2)JV4 ΠρϋνΟ — P~*) cusps of degree one and X^N) has (l/2)iV 2 n p N v(l-^- 2 ) cusps, there are (1/12)ΛΓ 7 Πρ,*(1-/τ 2 )(1-- / τ 4 ) points in X2(N) where three irreducible components of E intersect and there are (l/8)7V7I~f piiv(l —JP~2)(1 — P~*) rational curves where two irreducible components of E intersect. Therefore the first term in the fourth line in (*) is calculated as \2-iiei)\2-ii

Sczech This number was studied, among others by Ehlers [3] and Satake [5]. In [6], we established the following explicit expression for ψ(Μ, V, x). Theorem 4. Ψ(Μ, v, x)=(-LY 2 (-1)* Σ s; Π cjxT). \ Z / o ρτ>0 τζσ Aside from the missing signature term and the additional factor 2~n, the only difference between this expression and the corresponding expression in Theorem 3 is the slightly different definition of the trigonometric functions Ck(u): CM = φ) +1, Ck(u) = ck(u) foik>l. Despite these differences, we conjecture that Conjecture.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.38 of 5 – based on 44 votes